Skip to content

Companies are too passive in its approach to inappropriate behaviour

Amsterdam, August 7th 2024 – Although reports about inappropriate behaviour, (sexual) intimidation and abuse of power dominate the news, and senior officials regularly have to resign from their positions, companies are too passive when it comes to inappropriate behaviour. This is evident from new research by Validata, market leader in screening in the Netherlands, in collaboration with Hoffmann, a criminal investigation department company.

As many as 82% of the Dutch people think that organisations should do more to tackle inappropriate behaviour among employees. Women (86%) are more adamant about this than men (77%).

More research into employees could help reduce inappropriate behaviour.

Companies can limit the risks of inappropriate behaviour by conducting better research into (new) staff, according to two-thirds of the respondents. More than four out of five Dutch people (82%) understand that companies are now screening their employees extra due to the increased attention to inappropriate behaviour. Most respondents (69%) do not think that their privacy is infringed by a screening.

Screening current employees

Although as many as 88% of Dutch people do not think it is a problem if a (future) employer investigates them, and 86% understand if companies screen employees who receive a promotion extra, the number of screenings actually carried out decreased in the first half of 2024 compared to the previous year. According to 79% of those surveyed, this has to do with the shortage in the labor market.

Harm Voogt, Managing Director and founder of Validata, recognises this. “Although more and more Dutch employees and employers understand the importance of screening, companies simply also need staff. This is a major risk, especially in sectors where employees have access to sensitive information, such as financial and business services, and in government and education.”

Voogt: “Undesirable behaviour at a previous employer can come to light through screening. By adding screening to an application procedure, the bad apples often fall away naturally. Someone with a guilty conscience will think twice before starting an application with extensive screening.”

Hoffmann

Companies often choose the easy way out in case of conflicts in the workplace.

Not only can companies work more thoroughly when hiring employees, they also often take the easy way out when dealing with undesirable situations in the workplace. Johan Klokman, consultant at Hoffmann, explains that this is often an economic choice. “We see that employers refrain from investigating inappropriate behaviour for the wrong reason: the cost of the investigation.”

Many organisations prefer to opt for a so-called settlement agreement instead of conducting an investigation: a contract in which two or more parties make binding agreements for resolving or preventing a dispute.

No research encourages repetition

“In the cases where no investigation is carried out, it is not established what actually happened. In this way, repetition of undesirable behaviour can take place in the organisation or new organisation. In those cases, there is no reason to take measures in the eyes of these employers: after all the person who displayed the behaviour has left. That, in turn, is not encouraging for the willingness to report in the future,” says Klokman.

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site.
Select the region you are in: